PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20161118 |
Uptime | 1.7 Days |
Run Date | Jul 25 '18 at 20:55 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
XFX(1682 956D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.7.1
|
22.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 59 40 26 27 21 MB/s
|
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50
161GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 72 71 72 MB/s
|
40%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
177GB free
Firmware: HP40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 122 122 122 122 MB/s
|
68.9%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3
|
36.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 433x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 294x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 176x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 177x |
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 86x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 84x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $134 |