Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '18 at 15:34
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5440 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Memory 68.6 1-Core 16.3 2-Core 36.9 31% 40.6 Pts	4-Core 69.1 8-Core 76.3 10% 72.7 Pts	64-Core 81.8 5% 81.8 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	2.92% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 4 Parallax 2.94 3% 3.48 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 4.53 Splatting 2.96 3% 3.85 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.92% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 140 40 65 2.9 82 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.1% Poor	Read 156 Write 36.2 Mixed 42.2 SusWrite 73.6 17% 77 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 21.2 4K Mixed 10.6 49% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 11.6 DQ Write 16.8 DQ Mixed 12.3 10% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 85%
Samsung SP0812C 80GB 822 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 72GB free Firmware: SU100-30 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 57 57 58 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 56.2 Write 60.5 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 57.2 39% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 32%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 220 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 2096 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	3.08% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 1 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 2.4 5% 5.35 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.08% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	14.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 5.2 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P35-DS3L Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	37x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	16x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	10x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	9x
LCS-128L9S-11 2.5 7mm 128GBLiteonitBench 80%, 1,166 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	96x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	26x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $114

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16