Toshiba Satellite L55W-C

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite L55W-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF40 0692
Memory	9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '18 at 20:21
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5500U 73,655 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 94.9 2-Core 154 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 242 32% 238 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 F820) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.14% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 7 Parallax 6.69 4% 6.3 fps	MRender 8.67 Gravity 5.13 Splatting 10.6 7% 8.14 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.14% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 94 95 95 95 95 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 424 Write 210 Mixed 313 SusWrite 132 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 33.6 131% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 192 170% 254 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 90%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB 3,905 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 26GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 21 5.6 23 17 33 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 128 Write 66.5 Mixed 68.4 SusWrite 27.2 86% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.9 132% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 12GB 1,152 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.4 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 17.7 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite L55W-C Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L55W-C

CPU
Core i7-5500UIntelBench 46%, 73,655 samples	15x
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	10x
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	5x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	29x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	7x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 3,725 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	5x
MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 3,145 samples	2x
MZNLN128HCGR-00000 128GBSamsungBench 69%, 476 samples	2x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 12GBSamsungBench 39%, 1,152 samples	7x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	4x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $66

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16