Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell Studio XPS 8100
MotherboardDell Studio XPS 8100  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '18 at 21:47
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 94.9
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 121
56% 87 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 344
25% 226 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Nvidia(10DE 083D) 1GB
CLim: 650 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 14
11% 14.7 fps
MRender 18
Gravity 14
Splatting 15.7
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 141 108 91 77 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 148
Write 152
Mixed 101
SusWrite 105
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 13.9
51% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 59.5
78% 141 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 36%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
804GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 88 104 85 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 116
Write 82.3
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 92.5
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
708GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 107 97 107 99 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 58.4
Write 91
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 100
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $507
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback