Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '18 at 18:19
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 94.2 1-Core 73 2-Core 147 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 459 46% 374 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 847A) 2GB CLim: 1249 MHz, MLim: 1512 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Lighting 30.9 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 36.2 25% 32.1 fps	MRender 40.8 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 33.2 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LM480HMHQ-00005 480GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 369GB free Firmware: GXT5204Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 336 342 347 336 346 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 402 Write 393 Mixed 264 SusWrite 340 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 67.6 4K Mixed 37 124% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 30.1 DQ Write 95.1 DQ Mixed 42.7 38% 56 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 115%
Samsung MZ7LM480HMHQ-00005 480GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 152GB free Firmware: GXT5204Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 335 343 347 336 346 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 400 Write 393 Mixed 268 SusWrite 340 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 35.8 120% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 29.7 DQ Write 90.8 DQ Mixed 41.4 37% 54 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 115%
Samsung MZ7LM480HMHQ-00005 480GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXT5204Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 251 253 256 248 253 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.7% Good	Read 273 Write 232 Mixed 232 SusWrite 252 56% 247 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 21.7 87% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 220 165% 221 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 374GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 79 67 67 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 158 Write 146 Mixed 72 SusWrite 71.9 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 422GB free Firmware: CC6B SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 79 66 67 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 110 Write 62 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 71.8 55% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Vulcan-2133 2x4GB 609 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 17.3 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 13.4 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 59.4 67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16