Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '18 at 07:58
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
84% 178 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 799
80% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,302
87% 1,302 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$280
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 223
Reflection 200
Parallax 235
59% 219 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 202
Splatting 165
56% 173 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$69
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 125 122 127 129 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 457
Mixed 330
SusWrite 162
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 54.4
188% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 311
250% 352 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$130
698GB free
Firmware: JA2OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 19 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 85.8
Write 24.2
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 22.4
30% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$40
104GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 39 41 40 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 59.2
Write 58
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 39.3
36% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 3.3 3.1 3.9 3.9 4.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
9.24% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 15
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 3.5
18% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.2
135% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.24%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX2133C14/8G KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 88%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 23,503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $688
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback