Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite A215 (all builds)
Motherboard	ATI SB600
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071207
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '18 at 12:39
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60-$28 1,111 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Memory 59.1 1-Core 29.6 2-Core 58.8 33% 49.2 Pts	4-Core 56.5 8-Core 57.2 8% 56.8 Pts	64-Core 59.3 4% 59.3 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon X1200 Toshiba(1179 FF1A) 128MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.27 Reflection 0.35 0% 0.31 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS542512K9SA00 120GB-$25 1,782 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB2OC33P SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 42 42 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 44.9 Write 44.8 Mixed 27.9 SusWrite 40.7 29% 39.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 31%
WD Elements 250GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 128GB free Firmware: 8101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 25 25 26 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 23.7 Write 24.6 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 24.6 14% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 5.2 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 0.7 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16