Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T734

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T734 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB279
Memory	10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20180228
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '18 at 10:23
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39 33,019 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 90.5 2-Core 157 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 236 31% 235 Pts	64-Core 235 14% 235 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fujitsu(10CF 17B0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.76% Terrible	Lighting 3.87 Reflection 2.42 Parallax 2.38 3% 2.89 fps	MRender 7.33 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.87 5% 5.85 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.76% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 170 171 167 161 169 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	53% Above average	Read 389 Write 143 Mixed 202 SusWrite 167 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 13.4 75% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 29.6 46% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 70%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB 5,753 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 4GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 8 8.4 8.8 9 9.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	7.31% Terrible	Read 24.5 Write 12.5 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 7.9 13% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 2.8 121% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 1315 CT102464BF160B.C16 12GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 17.5 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 18.8 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical LIFEBOOK T734 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T734

CPU
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	7x
Core i5-4300MIntel $264Bench 51%, 13,678 samples	6x
Core i7-4600MIntelBench 56%, 7,260 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	17x

SSD
MZ7TE256HMHP-00004 256GBSamsungBench 75%, 878 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
Agility 3 120GBOCZ $102Bench 49%, 38,562 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBMicronBench 22%, 5,693 samples	3x
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GBMicronBench 41%, 87 samples	3x
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBMicronBench 50%, 304 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $39

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16