ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Hp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek Leonite2
Memory	1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071030
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '18 at 15:15
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130 8,675 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 74 1-Core 33.5 2-Core 64.2 40% 57.2 Pts	4-Core 66.2 8-Core 65.9 9% 66.1 Pts	64-Core 66.3 4% 66.3 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1600 19 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(18BC 1890) 256MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 74 75 75 75 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 242 Write 78.3 Mixed 117 SusWrite 71.8 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 49.8 4K Mixed 27.6 102% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 76.3 DQ Mixed 97.1 72% 94.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 69%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199 9,250 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 446GB free Firmware: X21200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 209 238 240 242 242 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.6% Good	Read 249 Write 234 Mixed 192 SusWrite 226 51% 225 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 31.2 104% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 142 118% 171 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 114%
JMicron Generic 40GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 36GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 23 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 25.8 Write 23.4 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 22.7 32% 24 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 7.2 532% 7.47 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 92.4 43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback