Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '18 at 04:15
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 113 2-Core 215 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 826 75% 629 Pts	64-Core 1,190 74% 1,190 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 122 Parallax 110 96% 117 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 106 Splatting 99.2 83% 102 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 296 292 285 277 263 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 465 Mixed 382 SusWrite 290 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 96.5 4K Mixed 47.9 166% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 360 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
WD Se 3TB (2013)-$67 926 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 139 140 139 138 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 147 Write 148 Mixed 112 SusWrite 139 101% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 99%
WD WD5003ABYZ-011FA0 500GB 2,936 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 115GB free Firmware: 01.01S03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 106 106 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 148 Write 125 Mixed 100 SusWrite 105 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 236% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 78%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB 7,970 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 18 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 163 Write 16.8 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 18.8 42% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 98%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27 3,642 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 11GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 25 25 24 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 129 Write 24.1 Mixed 44.1 SusWrite 25 59% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.8 137% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$201 13,611 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 41.5 MC Write 37.7 MC Mixed 33 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 35.3 SC Mixed 27.6 83% 29.1 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)