Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '18 at 23:52
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 283
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 800
77% 634 Pts
64-Core 799
50% 799 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 206
Parallax 197
149% 195 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 179
Splatting 126
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 478 473 463 380 284 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 455
Mixed 435
SusWrite 421
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 65.1
223% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 130%
Great: 129%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
194GB free
Firmware: AM002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 91 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 98.1
Mixed 33
SusWrite 90.8
58% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 60%
Maxtor STM3320613AS 320GB
269GB free
Firmware: MC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 114 118 116 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 115
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 66%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
216GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 86 92 90 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 88.4
Write 83.8
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 87.8
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
183GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 93 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 93.8
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 68%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
752GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 122 128 127 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 124
Write 107
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 125
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $992
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback