Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '18 at 21:36
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 143
58% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 345
38% 297 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 52.4
34% 41.7 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 37.7
29% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM02D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 231 224 203 200 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
64% Good
Read 424
Write 288
Mixed 282
SusWrite 211
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 21
89% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 151
115% 159 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64%
Great: 73%
Fusion-io ioDrive Duo 640GB
219GB free
Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 350 347 350 357 354 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
Read 584
Write 475
Mixed 471
SusWrite 337
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 49.2
165% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 193
167% 245 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Fusion-io ioDrive Duo 640GB
162GB free
Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 349 346 348 355 351 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 92% Great: 110%
Fusion-io ioDrive Duo 640GB
200GB free
Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 361 361 362 367 368 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
106% Outstanding
Read 564
Write 465
Mixed 455
SusWrite 347
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 47.1
163% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 190
162% 236 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Fusion-io ioDrive Duo 640GB
233GB free
Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 359 360 359 364 367 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
Read 545
Write 474
Mixed 446
SusWrite 350
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 48.3
169% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 193
172% 258 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
930GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 195 195 195 196 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 195
Mixed 108
SusWrite 192
130% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.6
336% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 118%
Great: 117%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
55GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 42 35 41 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 142
Write 76
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 37.9
99% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.6
175% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 37%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
11GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 17 17 4.2 0.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 20.4
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 12.9
27% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
123% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 39%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 121 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 130
Mixed 68
SusWrite 122
145% 104 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.4
199% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback