Gigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370M D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170922
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '18 at 20:30
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Memory 92.4 1-Core 116 2-Core 230 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 459 8-Core 459 61% 459 Pts	64-Core 459 28% 459 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB CLim: 1448 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Lighting 24.4 Reflection 19.3 Parallax 22.9 20% 22.2 fps	MRender 28.4 Gravity 25 Splatting 19 19% 24.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 382GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 440 428 419 435 433 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 429 Mixed 370 SusWrite 435 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 64.6 197% 71.7 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 362 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 499GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 175 175 175 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 120 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 175 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2.5 430% 3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 1x8GB 8,943 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	43.2% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 11.6 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.5 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	269x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	250x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	246x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	148x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	118x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	88x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	38x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	29x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $398

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16