Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y10c 3,050 User benchmarks, average bench 44% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Memory 44.9 1-Core 46 2-Core 101 37% 64 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 118 15% 113 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 161E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	3.22% Terrible	Lighting 2.77 Reflection 4.42 Parallax 4.12 2% 3.77 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 3.23 Splatting 9.61 5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.22% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CS1-SP32 32GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: LS52101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 52 56 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 342 Write 69.1 Mixed 91.6 SusWrite 54.4 30% 139 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 13.1 54% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 65.3 DQ Mixed 58 50% 74.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 4GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 14 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 12.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core M-5Y10cIntelBench 44%, 3,050 samples	31x

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	31x

SSD
CS1-SP32 32GBLiteonBench 49%, 103 samples	12x
RBU-SNS4151S332GG 32GBKingstonBench 31%, 6 samples	5x
NT-128 128GBBench 60%, 1,116 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16