Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180426
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '18 at 09:54
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 83 1-Core 121 2-Core 215 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 436 8-Core 755 72% 595 Pts	64-Core 1,178 73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	33.6% Below average	Lighting 43 Reflection 43.2 Parallax 42.3 35% 42.8 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 39.8 Splatting 35.1 31% 38 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 293 293 293 291 235 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 487 Mixed 390 SusWrite 301 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 95.7 4K Mixed 56.4 189% 65.2 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 269 198% 260 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 124%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 136GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 70 71 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 76.3 Write 40.5 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 70.2 43% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 389GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 92 91 93 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 89.6 Write 82.1 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 91.6 64% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 153 157 155 157 154 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 74 Write 69.5 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 154 64% 88 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 16GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 51 50 51 51 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	40% Average	Read 146 Write 47.5 Mixed 74.6 SusWrite 50.7 94% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 3 196% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D32BEEAK.K8FB 1x8GB 185 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 15.6 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 19.9 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	395x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16