Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 14 '18 at 18:59
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
SC Int 134
SC Float 132
SC Mixed 129
105% 132 Pts
QC Int 524
QC Float 518
QC Mixed 521
118% 521 Pts
MC Int 960
MC Float 1,054
MC Mixed 1,023
152% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 105%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$713
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (141 fps cap detected)
52.5% Above average
Lighting 141
Reflection 141
Parallax 141
44% 141 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 141
Splatting 141
59% 141 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 177%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$150
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 712 397 394 391 384 381 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 2,006
Write 1,640
Mixed 744
SusWrite 443
268% 1,208 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 59.3
216% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 1082
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 736
602% 864 MB/s
Poor: 169%
This bench: 215%
Great: 256%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$98
40GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 480 482 488 490 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 490
Mixed 420
SusWrite 484
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 66.6
224% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 353
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 136%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$350
1TB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 454 468 467 465 466 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 470
Mixed 412
SusWrite 464
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 53
181% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 295
240% 339 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 121%
Great: 122%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 108 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 107
Write 104
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 108
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C15 4x16GB-$751
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 56.9
MC Mixed 48.9
150% 52.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 27.5
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 52.7
76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 136%
Great: 163%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 2,242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback