Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '18 at 18:23
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 93.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 223 82% 143 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 620 61% 501 Pts	64-Core 622 38% 622 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% EVGA(3842 2639) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.92% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 5.81 Parallax 3.84 4% 4.85 fps	MRender 6.05 Gravity 4.83 Splatting 3.52 4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.92% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 206 261 260 245 212 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 451 Mixed 362 SusWrite 260 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 48.7 180% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 234 211% 320 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 118%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 815GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 127 122 124 127 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 118 Write 115 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 125 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 0.7 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	8.16% Terrible	Read 34 Write 8.4 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 2.9 15% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 8.16% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 28,461 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	62.1% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 19 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 21.3 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	216x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	145x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	91x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	42x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	49x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	33x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16