| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Boot Drive | 86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150526 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 13 '18 at 02:15 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
|
87.3%
Excellent
|
83% 143 Pts
|
68% 553 Pts
|
39% 637 Pts
|
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 285 203 145 90 91 MB/s
|
86.8%
Excellent
|
68% 304 MB/s
|
150% 57 MB/s
|
131% 221 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
104GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 98 100 101 100 MB/s
|
78.6%
Very good
|
89% 122 MB/s
|
224% 1.67 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
126GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 87 88 88 88 MB/s
|
37%
Below average
|
98% 73 MB/s
|
98% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
60.6%
Good
|
59% 20.6 GB/s
|
55% 19.1 GB/s
|
67% 59.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,847 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 563x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 387x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 236x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 266x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 208x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 169x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $344 |