Asus H110M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 23:42
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium G4400-$50
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.4% Average
SC Int 98.1
SC Float 106
SC Mixed 102
82% 102 Pts
QC Int 196
QC Float 211
QC Mixed 202
46% 203 Pts
MC Int 196
MC Float 212
MC Mixed 199
30% 202 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1175 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.3
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 83.9
Reflection 83.4
Parallax 110
29% 92.3 fps
MRender 58.1
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 75.2
29% 69.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29%
Great: 30%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$73
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 294 297 299 303 302 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 429
Write 294
Mixed 259
SusWrite 299
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 33
127% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 244
208% 306 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$138
30GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 137 139 139 146 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 413
Mixed 340
SusWrite 157
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 51.5
174% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 174
180% 294 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 108%
iXpand Flash Drive 128GB
119GB free, PID cffa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 12 12 13 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 85.3
Write 12.2
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 12.8
31% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.7
173% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$86
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 23
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $615
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $340Nvidia GTX 1070 $329Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $240Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $799Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $120SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback