Lenovo 80QQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80QQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Nano 5B6
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150916
Uptime17 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 19:39
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
SC Int 18.2
SC Float 20.5
SC Mixed 19.2
16% 19.3 Pts
QC Int 59.3
QC Float 80.7
QC Mixed 86.6
17% 75.5 Pts
MC Int 106
MC Float 128
MC Mixed 121
18% 118 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 382A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 18.7
5% 14.7 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 16.3
5% 12.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT63L1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 326
Write 66.1
Mixed 123
37% 172 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 12
41% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 21.8
DQ Mixed 33.8
38% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 56%
WD 1600BEV External 160GB
9GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 35.7
Write 38.6
Mixed 25.4
42% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 20%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
RAMAXEL RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 80QQ Builds (Compare 1,866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation 15%

System: Lenovo 80QQ

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $367Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $243Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $104
Intel Core i5-8600K $237AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback