Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	7.09% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 39.3 1-Core 15.7 2-Core 35.3 21% 30.1 Pts	4-Core 99.1 8-Core 122 14% 110 Pts	64-Core 170 10% 170 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21CF) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	0.77% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1 0% 0.99 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 2.35 2% 1.75 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.77% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC128GCSJ 128GB 1,192 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJLA0201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 9.3 9.1 9.4 8.9 9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	7.09% Terrible	Read 78.9 Write 39.1 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 10.1 10% 44.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 3.1 11% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 7.09% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 14.8 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.9 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 206 20% 206 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16