Asus K75VJ

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus K75VJ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K75VJ
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121210
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '18 at 18:16
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	68% Good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 167 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 324 39% 300 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 10BC) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3308 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.77% Terrible	Lighting 4.57 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 1.81 4% 3.96 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 5 Splatting 3.48 4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.77% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso 128GB 128GB 1,805 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0213E SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 156 160 162 159 160 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	58% Above average	Read 476 Write 77 Mixed 204 SusWrite 160 50% 229 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 54.4 4K Mixed 11.5 74% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 60.4 77% 138 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 96%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB 31,958 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 332GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 59 59 60 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 57 Write 40 Mixed 39 SusWrite 57.9 36% 48.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 57%
Generic- Multi-Card 16GB 320 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 8GB free, PID 0138 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 10 10 9.9 10 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	7.02% Terrible	Read 19 Write 9.8 Mixed 13 SusWrite 9.9 16% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 53% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.02% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB 25,458 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.6 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 16.8 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K75VJ Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K75VJ

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	81x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	48x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	19x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	143x
GeForce GT 635MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,113 samples	28x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	3x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	4x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	44x
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 53%, 6,794 samples	12x
HMT325S6CFR8C-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 6GBHynixBench 41%, 2,250 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $458

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16