Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130116
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 16:08
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 143
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 437
44% 354 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 154
Parallax 144
113% 146 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 143
Splatting 116
102% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 120GB-$106
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 141 133 138 138 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 383
Write 195
Mixed 241
SusWrite 139
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 32.3
116% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 95.1
85% 126 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 88%
OCZ Agility 4 256GB-$90
96GB free
Firmware: 1.5.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 183 179 193 182 197 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62% Good
Read 240
Write 185
Mixed 168
SusWrite 186
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 27.1
108% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 26.3
62% 129 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62%
Great: 87%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
330GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 79 80 79 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 64.5
Write 74.8
Mixed 65
SusWrite 78.7
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
668GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 174 173 177 175 176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C11D3/4G KHX1866C9D3/4GX KHX1866C11D3/4G KHX1866C9D3/4GX 16GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 18.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 13
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback