Cisco UCS-E140S-M1/K9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (100th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 0 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCisco UCS-E140S-M1/K9  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco UCS-E140S-M1/K9
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 15:32
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 26.3
2-Core 53.1
33% 47.7 Pts
4-Core 87.3
8-Core 134
14% 111 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MRSASRoMB-4i 999GB
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 41 47 51 36 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.5% Below average
Read 85.7
Write 71
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 48.2
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Cypress Astoria SD Card 8GB
7GB free, PID 4717
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.04% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 13.2
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 14.3
15% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Dimm0_Manufacturer Dimm0_ Dimm1_Manufacturer Dimm1_ 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback