| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Toshiba SATELLITE C660 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA PWWAM |
| Memory | 2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120508 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 12 '18 at 14:33 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium T4500
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
|
38%
Below average
|
36% 54.1 Pts
|
8% 63 Pts
|
4% 63.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
|
0.36%
Terrible
|
0% 0.4 fps
|
0% 0.44 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MK5065GSX 500GB-$52
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 68 69 69 70 MB/s
|
41.6%
Average
|
44% 61.2 MB/s
|
115% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14.3%
Very poor
|
12% 4.3 GB/s
|
12% 4.1 GB/s
|
36% 112 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 549 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 120x |
| Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples | 75x |
| Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 73x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples | 174x |
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 168x |
| Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples | 71x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $158 |