| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161227 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 12 '18 at 10:07 |
| Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.8%
Very good
|
79% 138 Pts
|
41% 309 Pts
|
19% 308 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
|
34.6%
Below average
|
36% 38.2 fps
|
32% 39.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
654GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 129 168 177 181 177 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
109% 149 MB/s
|
159% 1.2 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
294GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 124 125 126 126 MB/s
|
73.6%
Very good
|
84% 115 MB/s
|
166% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.M8FB CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD2 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
70.5%
Very good
|
71% 24.7 GB/s
|
62% 21.7 GB/s
|
60% 66.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,905 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,111x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 636x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 553x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 837x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 467x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 366x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |