Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 09:59
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4790K-$365
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
78.3% Very good
SC Int 115
SC Float 119
SC Mixed 115
93% 116 Pts
QC Int 380
QC Float 395
QC Mixed 372
87% 382 Pts
MC Int 580
MC Float 636
MC Mixed 607
91% 608 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$243
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Lighting 230
Reflection 204
Parallax 243
73% 226 fps
MRender 151
Gravity 216
Splatting 165
76% 177 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$100
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 281 285 255 230 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 406
Write 476
Mixed 384
SusWrite 259
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 38.7
138% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 327
248% 334 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$84
238GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 296 295 313 300 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 482
Mixed 404
SusWrite 300
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 50.1
174% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 286
234% 333 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 108%
Great: 116%
OCZ Vertex 4 512GB-$448
79GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 295 293 311 298 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 374
Write 400
Mixed 260
SusWrite 294
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 36.6
145% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 318
243% 329 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 100 109 112 99 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 92.5
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 118
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST2000DM001-1CH164 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 167 168 162 167 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 161
Write 126
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 165
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 105%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
617GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 112 126 126 122 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 87.3
Write 108
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 122
124% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
5% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 27.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 26.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 7,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $359Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $243Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-8600K $237Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $770Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback