User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemCDM DQ57TM-R01
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101207
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 02:09
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5 760-$220
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.2% Above average
SC Int 75.5
SC Float 82.9
SC Mixed 78.9
63% 79.1 Pts
QC Int 268
QC Float 295
QC Mixed 282
64% 282 Pts
MC Int 270
MC Float 294
MC Mixed 282
42% 282 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
AMD(1002 0008) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 3
Parallax 4.8
1% 3.83 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.5
1% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.16%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$43
10GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 23 17 13 21 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 2
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 18.3
18% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.2
225% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 15%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14.7
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $359Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $243Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-8600K $237AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback