Asrock QC5000M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 20%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock QC5000M  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 00:18
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A4-5000 APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
SC Int 29.1
SC Float 23.4
SC Mixed 25.8
21% 26.1 Pts
QC Int 115
QC Float 88.3
QC Mixed 102
23% 102 Pts
MC Int 111
MC Float 88.7
MC Mixed 102
15% 100 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
ASRock(1849 9832) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 7.3
2% 7.8 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 7.7
2% 6.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 64 83 100 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 108
Write 103
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 88.3
64% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical QC5000M Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 22%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock QC5000M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $64
The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $359Nvidia GTX 1070 $340Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $243Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
Intel Core i5-8600K $237AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback