Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 23:52
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 90.7
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 71.3
46% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 427
31% 283 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.2% Above average
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 80.6
Parallax 117
43% 83.3 fps
MRender 96.3
Gravity 124
Splatting 104
88% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 60GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 114 116 113 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 333
Write 116
Mixed 174
SusWrite 113
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 26.1
93% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 111
88% 121 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 80%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
116GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 90 87 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 97
Write 91.7
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 88.7
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 59%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
6GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 5.7 4.2 6 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.35% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 2.3
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.5
10% 9.2 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.35%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $846
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback