Asus E3 PRO GAMING V5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus E3 PRO GAMING V5  (all builds)
Memory44.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151123
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 23:25
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 59.1
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 114
44% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 517
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 842 784 778 771 783 755 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,009
Write 895
Mixed 552
SusWrite 785
182% 810 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 36.4
135% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,140
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 446
410% 653 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 163%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
336GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 428 351 338 332 333 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 432
Mixed 374
SusWrite 368
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 42.5
143% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 355
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
780GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 422 419 421 421 412 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 424
Mixed 383
SusWrite 420
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 38.6
130% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 338
255% 340 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 133%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
2GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 9.8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 3.2
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 22.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 19.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E3 PRO GAMING V5 Builds (Compare 253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus E3 PRO GAMING V5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $169
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback