| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus Z170M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160509 |
| Uptime | 23.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 11 '18 at 21:25 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.6%
Very good
|
72% 124 Pts
|
52% 404 Pts
|
28% 456 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85C6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.2%
Poor
|
29% 26.6 fps
|
18% 22.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
715GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 354 366 315 343 338 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
86% 385 MB/s
|
170% 61.4 MB/s
|
255% 340 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 176 184 172 182 171 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
103% 141 MB/s
|
165% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 173 181 170 181 173 MB/s
|
99.5%
Outstanding
|
103% 142 MB/s
|
157% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.3%
Good
|
68% 23.8 GB/s
|
52% 18.3 GB/s
|
52% 76.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,229 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 384x |
| Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 289x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 201x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 121x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 113x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 92x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $536 |