Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z10PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory	121.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160622
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '18 at 21:06
Run Duration	385 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 987 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 71.9 2-Core 144 59% 98.1 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 556 50% 421 Pts	64-Core 1,630 101% 1,630 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% MSI(1462 2015) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Lighting 70 Reflection 62.4 Parallax 84.6 57% 72.3 fps	MRender 62.1 Gravity 56.3 Splatting 80.5 56% 66.3 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 52%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.1% Below average	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 37.6 33% 36.1 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 35.5 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 231GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 71 71 72 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 483 Write 73.6 Mixed 129 SusWrite 71.5 41% 189 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 4.3 65% 15 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 126%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 34GB free Firmware: 0006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 134 134 133 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 343 Write 137 Mixed 191 SusWrite 134 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 73 4K Mixed 14 102% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 90.3 91% 150 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 62%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 112GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 0 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 46.5 Write 5.5 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 3.4 5% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 6.9 48% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 8.1 DQ Write 12.3 DQ Mixed 12.6 9% 11 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 73%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 261GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 75 75 75 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 493 Write 34.7 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 75.3 36% 170 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 4 75% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 650GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 132 132 123 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 456 Write 106 Mixed 196 SusWrite 122 48% 220 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 4.5 67% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 133%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 524GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 131GB free, PID 0307 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 23 27 30 28 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.6% Very poor	Read 70.3 Write 15.8 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 24.7 37% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 49% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 22%
USB Flash Disk 4GB 141 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.9 5.2 5.2 5.9 5.9 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	6.05% Terrible	Read 20.8 Write 3.5 Mixed 3.8 SusWrite 5.6 9% 8.42 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.05% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x16GB 2,632 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	96.1% Outstanding	MC Read 47.4 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 35.3 110% 38.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 14.9 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GBIntel $550Bench 186%, 8,641 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	21x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 8x8GBMicronBench 92%, 150 samples	12x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $643

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16