Asrock H110M-DVS/D3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H110M-DVS/D3 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '18 at 18:43
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4400-$45 36,432 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 211 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 209 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.2.3 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32% Below average	Lighting 41.6 Reflection 20.6 Parallax 52.2 34% 38.2 fps	MRender 27.2 Gravity 41 Splatting 34.8 28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 456 Write 408 Mixed 284 85% 383 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 51.6 184% 65.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 175 180% 294 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 17GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 61 56 67 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	34% Below average	Read 55.3 Write 58.2 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 62.8 41% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 59%
Silicon Power Blaze B10 USB 3.0 16GB-$20 185 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 13GB free, PID 0916 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 23.7 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 23.6 32% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 1x8GB 1,269 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	28% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.03 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 9.4 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-DVS/D3 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS/D3

CPU
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	16x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	13x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	11x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	7x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	16x
SA100 1920GBAcerBench 83%, 78 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x

RAM
BLS4G3D169DS3.16FE 2x4GBCrucialBench 55%, 2,099 samples	7x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	5x
DMT451E6AFR8C-PB 8GBHynixBench 46%, 91 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 40% - Below average

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16