Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 14:01
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 141
59% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 394
39% 320 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.9% Outstanding
Lighting 109
Reflection 158
Parallax 135
89% 134 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 140
Splatting 114
101% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP 600NS34 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 154 156 156 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.5% Very good
Read 401
Write 158
Mixed 194
SusWrite 152
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 38.6
142% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 115
111% 178 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 79%
WDC WDS1 20G2G0A-00JH30 120GB
77GB free
Firmware: UE30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 85 88 82 83 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 474
Write 205
Mixed 131
SusWrite 89.4
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 15.8
72% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 43.3
DQ Mixed 20.5
31% 61 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
264GB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 173 171 174 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 187
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 172
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 106%
Great: 88%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
27GB free
Firmware: 20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 40 40 43 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 59.8
Write 55.8
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 41.3
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS512MLK64V6H Apacer 78.BAGEJ.AFK0C TS512MLK64V6H Apacer 78.BAGEJ.AFK0C 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.9% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback