Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '18 at 13:42
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 107 2-Core 212 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 729 69% 574 Pts	64-Core 1,088 67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6593) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	109% Outstanding	Lighting 133 Reflection 196 Parallax 193 108% 174 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 176 Splatting 129 117% 144 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 495 Write 473 Mixed 395 101% 454 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 91.8 4K Mixed 55.7 184% 63.2 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 299 225% 300 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 131%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 167 171 169 174 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 150 Write 150 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 170 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.8 244% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC98 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 63 63 63 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 100 Write 85.7 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 62.8 50% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 620GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 90 91 93 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 87.8 Write 84.5 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 91.5 60% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 84%
Generic Mass-Storage 16GB 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 14 16 16 16 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	7.25% Terrible	Read 19 Write 15.3 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 15.1 18% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.25% Great: 16%
Seagate Wireless 1TB 411 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 883GB free, PID a313 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 36 36 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 34.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 35.4 47% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	92.5% Outstanding	MC Read 39.5 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 31.9 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 25.4 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)