Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180510
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '18 at 09:06
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 76.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 233 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 778 75% 617 Pts	64-Core 1,233 76% 1,233 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3751) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	131% Outstanding	Lighting 182 Reflection 206 Parallax 177 148% 188 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 180 Splatting 134 121% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 834GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1995 2074 1248 1137 1138 1130 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	294% Outstanding	Read 2,391 Write 1,982 Mixed 1497 SusWrite 1,454 410% 1,831 MB/s	4K Read 58.8 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 71.1 244% 83.5 MB/s	DQ Read 901 DQ Write 634 DQ Mixed 776 577% 770 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 294% Great: 372%
WD Red Pro 4TB (2014)-$189 679 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 125 124 123 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 123 Write 102 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 124 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 101%
WD WD8001FFWX-68J1UN0 8TB 379 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 173 164 156 169 158 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 164 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 162 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.7 206% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 100 100 100 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 76.3 Write 68 Mixed 49 SusWrite 99.4 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 85%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 849GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 147 149 143 150 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 118 Write 107 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 146 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 11GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.9 9.9 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	4.69% Terrible	Read 15 Write 13.3 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 10 17% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 4.69% Great: 38%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.0 128GB-$60 1,435 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 0GB free, PID 5588 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 55.8 Write 34 Mixed 2.7 32% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 8.4 712% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 12.2 DQ Write 12 DQ Mixed 10 794% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3466C16 4x8GB 1,229 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.8% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 25 76% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 24.2 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,069

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16