Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180501
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '18 at 23:44
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 104 2-Core 208 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 405 55% 408 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 180 Write 355 Mixed 21.5 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 33.5 109% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 182 181% 289 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 33GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 105 106 125 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 124 Write 128 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 119 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 113%
Intenso Alu Line 64GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 31GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 9.4 9.2 8.3 9.6 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	5.68% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 4 Mixed 10 SusWrite 8.9 12% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.68% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB 2,853 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	MC Read 47.7 MC Write 45.6 MC Mixed 40.3 127% 44.5 GB/s	SC Read 24.2 SC Write 42.2 SC Mixed 29.5 91% 32 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)