Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3010 352 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 48.3 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 42.6 26% 37.6 Pts	4-Core 44.5 8-Core 43.1 6% 43.8 Pts	64-Core 43 3% 43 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 9809) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 1.63 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 2.44 1% 2.15 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 3.09 2% 2.41 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GKP59-128GB 128GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0327B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 241 83 58 50 60 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 402 Write 380 Mixed 360 SusWrite 138 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 46 4K Mixed 20.6 83% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 89.1 DQ Mixed 41.4 47% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 1x4GB 4,437 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 4.3 17% 5.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3010IntelBench 24%, 352 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 4,437 samples	1x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16