PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170914 |
Uptime | 9.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 10 '18 at 14:05 |
Run Duration | 214 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
85.8%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2777 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 811 554 547 546 537 542 MB/s
|
191%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
962GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 149 144 143 142 140 MB/s
|
83.6%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
963GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 123 123 125 126 MB/s
|
81.1%
Excellent
|
|||
45.1%
Average
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
120GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 77 78 78 78 MB/s
|
52%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung S2 Portable 1TB
801GB free, PID 1f0a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.7 0.3 1 0.8 0.7 MB/s
|
5.82%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
80%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 124x |
Core i9-7900XIntel $462Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 88x |
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 33x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 97x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 30x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 22x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $903 |