Asrock Z370 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime26.2 Days
Run DateJul 09 '18 at 21:56
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 875
85% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 39.8
34% 38.6 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 38.7
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,746
Write 6,442
Mixed 7,127
1,584% 7,105 MB/s
4K Read 478
4K Write 237
4K Mixed 300
1,235% 338 MB/s
DQ Read 1,241
DQ Write 807
DQ Mixed 904
706% 984 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
88GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 297 217 216 222 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 491
Mixed 402
SusWrite 274
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 62.5
208% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 362
272% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000H1 256GB
0GB free
Firmware: EXT09H0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 259
Mixed 204
71% 324 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 32.6
149% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 80.2
122% 233 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 88%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
231GB free
Firmware: CT100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 62 64 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 62
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 62.5
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
758GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 76 84 85 81 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 86
Write 91.7
Mixed 32
SusWrite 82.3
97% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Extreme4 - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $974
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback