PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds) |
Memory | 1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170607 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 07 '18 at 18:40 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 168 93 83 94 87 MB/s
|
66.7%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
179GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 85 86 86 84 MB/s
|
35.4%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
86GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
162GB free, PID 0477
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
|||
ST500LM0 12 HN-M500MBB 500GB
43GB free, PID 0236
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 431x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 85x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 86x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 66x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $588 |