Asrock 990FX Killer/3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160114
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '18 at 12:55
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	41%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$87 33,199 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 79.6 1-Core 55.6 2-Core 103 51% 79.3 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 282 29% 236 Pts	64-Core 315 20% 315 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.9% Very good	Lighting 92.5 Reflection 101 Parallax 95.2 75% 96.4 fps	MRender 88.7 Gravity 88.6 Splatting 92.3 74% 89.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 395GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 427 Write 405 Mixed 346 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 40.3 134% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 259 195% 260 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,889 Write 37 Mixed 59.2 475% 662 MB/s	4K Read 207 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 2.3 8,909% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 10,150 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.4% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 15.9 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 11.6 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer/3.1

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	11x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	4x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	3x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	4x
Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBNvme $45Bench 187%, 23,539 samples	2x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	3x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $326

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16