Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '18 at 10:19
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 250
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 990
87% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,673
104% 1,673 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2875 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.3% Good
Lighting 45.2
Reflection 27
Parallax 32.6
37% 35 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 179
Splatting 127
118% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 774 861 975 975 961 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,781
Write 1,448
Mixed 649
SusWrite 880
265% 1,190 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 52.3
206% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,198
DQ Write 846
DQ Mixed 734
626% 926 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 233%
Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
33GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 325 383 461 188 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 456
Mixed 390
SusWrite 296
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 53.1
182% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 279
231% 332 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
227GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 325 382 466 461 461 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 458
Mixed 388
SusWrite 402
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 53.3
183% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
716GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 105 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 105
71% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
12GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 196 196 196 188 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 158
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 194
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
9GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 156
Write 69.5
Mixed 41.5
94% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.7% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 17.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 10.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,340
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback