Asus ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 06:12
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 267
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 762
78% 633 Pts
64-Core 771
48% 771 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 79.5
53% 70.7 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 55.5
49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$84
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 294 294 291 298 297 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 480
Write 458
Mixed 242
SusWrite 297
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 33.9
119% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 235
195% 283 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 107%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
68GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 440 393 344 197 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 481
Mixed 382
SusWrite 325
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 64
216% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
476GB free
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 900 532 534 531 532 530 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,437
Write 1,485
Mixed 1,281
SusWrite 593
321% 1,449 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 93.7
311% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,339
DQ Write 1064
DQ Mixed 1105
853% 1,169 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 284%
Great: 293%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 99 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 104
Write 96.3
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 99.4
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
141GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 79 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 68
SusWrite 79.9
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.6% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.6
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING Builds (Compare 1,451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $916
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback