| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
| Graphics | 0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A |
| Memory | 1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110905 |
| Uptime | 4.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 05 '18 at 17:31 |
| Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 48% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium B940
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
19% 29.2 Pts
|
6% 45 Pts
|
4% 60.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C606) 1.8GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.78%
Terrible
|
1% 1.43 fps
|
1% 1.16 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
147% 204 MB/s
|
5,794% 45.8 MB/s
| ||
|
|
19% 15.7 MB/s
|
60% 1.53 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
21%
Poor
|
22% 7.63 GB/s
|
16% 5.47 GB/s
|
16% 258 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A Builds (Compare 171 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples | 52x |
| Core i3-2330MIntel $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples | 49x |
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 32x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 103x |
| GeForce GT 520MXNvidiaBench 2%, 1,577 samples | 29x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $81 |