Dell Precision T7610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T7610
MotherboardDell Precision T7610  (all builds)
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180104
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 05 '18 at 07:53
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 182
74% 122 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 434
48% 368 Pts
64-Core 460
31% 460 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 54.1
Reflection 53.3
Parallax 72.9
44% 60.1 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 40.3
40% 50.6 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 50%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
507GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 398 293 118 137 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 477
Write 425
Mixed 375
SusWrite 247
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 33.4
108% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 203
167% 239 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 127%
Samsung 850 2TB
841GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 405 434 424 440 438 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 440
Mixed 394
SusWrite 426
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 33.8
109% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 231
181% 250 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 118%
SK hynix SH920 2.5 7MM 512GB
64GB free
Firmware: 8L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 352 379 370 382 382 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 463
Write 371
Mixed 328
SusWrite 371
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 23.2
80% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 227
177% 243 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$249
42GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 177 174 214 210 241 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 471
Write 401
Mixed 351
SusWrite 225
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 31.7
103% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 251
189% 253 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
340GB free
Firmware: BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 404 310 16 24 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 428
Write 429
Mixed 401
SusWrite 197
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 32.9
106% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 199
164% 236 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.4
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Precision T7610 Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback