Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '18 at 16:18
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 295
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 834
81% 663 Pts
64-Core 850
53% 850 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.8% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 50.9
44% 55.8 fps
MRender 77.6
Gravity 54.3
Splatting 70.9
56% 67.6 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 471 473 469 458 473 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 452
Mixed 349
SusWrite 468
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 63.5
214% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 130%
Great: 89%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
387GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 413 341 289 289 285 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 405
Write 445
Mixed 298
SusWrite 340
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 42.7
155% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 311
240% 328 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 104%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
892GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 476 478 484 482 485 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 454
Mixed 433
SusWrite 478
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 63
211% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 130%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 184 184 186 182 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 144
Mixed 81
SusWrite 181
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
MICRONET FANTOM DRIVE 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 43
55% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2958 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 26
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 29.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 50.8
79% 50.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $772
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback