Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJul 04 '18 at 14:01
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 186
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 464
48% 388 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 198
Parallax 195
133% 186 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 175
Splatting 119
113% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 251 223 140 118 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 476
Write 454
Mixed 353
SusWrite 194
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 40.1
133% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 231
210% 320 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 118%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
414GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 113 111 114 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 112
Write 111
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 113
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 84%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 41 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 74.2
Write 70.8
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 40.3
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33%
Great: 49%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
381GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 66 65 67 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 90.5
Write 89.5
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 65.6
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 72%
WD Elements 1TB
239GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 72 72 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 70
Write 71
Mixed 43
SusWrite 72.3
86% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $575
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback