PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus B150 PRO GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180328 |
Uptime | 3.8 Days |
Run Date | Jul 02 '18 at 12:33 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2120 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 263 259 258 254 251 MB/s
|
128%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
347GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 125 124 126 124 MB/s
|
70.3%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
70.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 118x |
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 111x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 95x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 115x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 91x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 43x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $396 |